LGBTI PEOPLE IN SERBIA BETWEEN HOMOPHOBIC VIOLENCE AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION

Authors

  • Zorica Mrsevic institute of social sciences

Keywords:

LGBTI people in Serbia, legitimacy of securitization, homophobic violence, degree of social integration, positive attitudes, rejection of prejudices, changes in police interventions, legal regulations

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the paper is to present current trends of improving the position of LGBTI people in Serbia, in which this population is increasingly playing a role. The paper also aims to indicate that improvements lead to increase in social cohesion, but also to warn that long-standing obstacles and challenges have not yet been removed. Design/Methods/ Approach. Applied design comprises both case study and research findings. Namely, cases documented by human rights activists show that homophobic violence is still dominant feature of everyday life, especially of young LGBTI people. But at the same time, recent research indicates an increase in the willingness of citizens to have closer private and professional relationships with LGBTI people, while rejecting negative stereotypes and prejudices about them. The author tries to answering the important questions, whose vulnerability has legitimacy, who has the capacity to point out the relevance of the threat and who to make legitimate decisions, binding on relevant actors, relying that the survival of vulnerable entities remains a central issue of any security. Findings. Main finding of the text is that LGBTI people in Serbia are slowly but steadily gaining necessary securitization capacity, becoming actors of changes, who increasingly participate in the processes of solving the challenges of their own securitization. That way, they are more in position to put on the mainstream political agenda their security endangered by the continuous victimization by violence and discrimination. Originality/Value. The main value of the paper is presentation the LGBTI people’s authentic requests for improvements regarding changes of  the police interventions, adoption of public policies and necessary synergy activities of several different securitization actors, e.g. governmental entities, non-governmental organizations and independent institutions.

References

CeSID. (2021). Towards better understanding of LGBT persons rights and their position in society. Opinion Poll Report and Communication Campaign Recommendations of Same-Sex Unions Law. Belgrade: EU, CoE.

Diković, J. (2022, June 9). Miletić: The attackers believe that the Pride Info Center is a legitimate target because there is no condemnation of the authorities. Danas, Belgrade. 09. Accessed on June 10, 2022. https://www.danas.rs/vesti/drustvo/miletic-napadaci-veruju-da-je-prajd-info-centar-legitimna-meta-jer-izostaje-osuda-vlasti/

Gavrić, S. & Čaušević, J. (2021). From Demedicalisation to Same-Sex Marriage: A Contemporary LGBT History of the Western Balkans. Belgrade: Belgrade Pride/Pride Society.

Geten. (2021). The degree of social integration of the LGBTI+ population in Serbia. Belgrade: Geten. Accessed on June 2, 2022.
https://www.transserbia.org/images/2021/dokumenta/Stepen_drustvene_integrisanosti.pdf

Labris. (2017). Razvoj politika za zaštitu LGBT osoba – Mere zagovaranja. Belgrade: Labris.

Labris. (2018). Samo neka je šareno. Istraživanje potreba i problema LGBT zajednice u Srbiji za 2018. godinu. Belgrade: Labris.

Ministarstvo za ljudska i manjinska prava i društveni dijalog. (2021). Polazne osnove za izradu Nacrta zakona o istopolnom partnerstvu - Ex ante analiza. Br: 011-00-00003/2021-01 februar 2021.godine. Beograd: MLJMPDD.

Mršević, Z. (2009). Ka demokratskom društvu – istopolne porodice. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.

Mršević, Z. (2019). Položaj lezbejki u Srbiji. In: N. Macanović (Ed.), Položaj marginalizovanih grupa u društvu (pp. 618-625), Banjaluka: Fakultet političkih nauka. Centar modernih znanja.
Beograd: Fakultet za specijalnu rehabilitaciju i edukaciju, str. 618-625.

Mršević, Z. (2020). Izazovi i perspektive duginih porodica. Temida, 23(1), 57-77.

Poverenik za zaštitu ravnopravnosti. (2011). Redovan godišnji izveštaj za 2010. godinu. Accessed on June 2, 2022.
http://ravnopravnost.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/images_files_Redovan%20godisnji%20izvestaj%202010.pdf

Promo. (2022, June 6). We can be different, but still make a whole - and that is for respect! Mondo, Belgrade. Accessed on June 5, 2022.
https://mondo.rs/Info/Drustvo/a1646913/Mozemo-da-budemo-razliciti-a-da-ipak-cinimo-celinu-i-to-je-za-rispekt.html

Vlada Republike Srbije. (2022). Strategija prevencije i zaštite od diskriminacije za period od 2022. do 2030. godine. 12/2022-58. Accessed on June 2, 2022. https://www.pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/SlGlasnikPortal/eli/rep/sgrs/vlada/strategija/2022/12/2

Zaštitnika građana. (2020). Redovan godišnji izveštaj za 2019. Rodna ravnopravnost i prava LGBTI osoba. Belgrade: Zaštitnik građana.

Radoman, J., Radoman, M. i Šapić, J. (2017). Kako reforma sektora bezbednosti utiče na ljudsku bezbednost u Srbiji: Ponovna procena uticaja reforme sektora bezbednosti na LGBT populaciju. Beograd: Organizacija za evropsku bezbednost i saradnju, Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji i Centar za istraživanje javnih politika.

Tanjug. (2019, 20 februar). Premijerka Brnabić dobila sina. Mondo. Accessed on December 15. http://mondo.rs/a1167604/Info/Srbija/Ana-Brnabic-dobila-sina.html

Zakon broj XXIX o registrovanim istopolnim zajednicama (Törvény, amely szabályozza a bejegyzett élettársi kapcsolatokról szóló ) stupio na snagu 1. jula 2009. godine. Zakon koji uređuje zasnivanje i prestanak odnosa između lica istog pola. Statistika primene tog Zakona: Bejegyzett élettársi kapcsolatok). Accessed on January 19, 2022. https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/nep/hu/nep0018.html

Živić, P. (2019, June 6). Violence against LGBT people in Serbia: Between statistics and reality. BBC Serbia, Belgrade. Accessed on June 2, 2022. https://www.bbc.com/serbian/lat/srbija-48528868

Downloads

Published

2023-04-04

Issue

Section

Etiology, Phenomenology and Trends of Contemporary Crime