THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW

Authors

  • Višnja Ranđelović Assistant professor, Faculty of Law, University of Kragujevac

Keywords:

cultural heritage, destruction, armed conflict, International Criminal Law, protection, international criminal courts.

Abstract

Purpose: Throughout history, wars have been accompanied by the destruction of cultural assets and cultural heritage. With the development of the first international rules of war, the protection of cultural property during armed conflicts was also developing over time. This protection expands and improves to finally include the criminal law protection of cultural property during armed conflict. The purpose of the paper is to point out the international rules of criminal law protection of cultural property during armed conflict, as well as the practice of international criminal courts in terms of trials for the war crime of destruction of cultural heritage.

Design/Methods/Approach: After the introduction, the paper will shortly deal with the international documents and rules related to the protection of cultural heritage. Then, the international criminal law protection of cultural heritage will be analyzed in detail by using the legal dogmatic method of legal norms analysis. Finally, the case law of international criminal courts and tribunals will be analyzed using the content analysis method.

Findings: The key finding refers to the insufficiency and impossibility of a wide range of international rules (outside of international criminal law) to protect cultural heritage during armed conflicts. Bearing in mind the reasons why cultural heritage is the object of destruction during almost all conflicts, the author finds that it is justified to establish international criminal law protection of cultural heritage but questions the possibilities and boundaries of this kind of protection.

Originality/Value: In light of the judgement in the Al Mahdi case before the International Criminal Court, the paper will discuss some new findings related to International Criminal Law protection of cultural heritage during armed conflicts, which can be useful for the protection of Serbian cultural heritage damaged and destroyed during a former conflict.

Keywords: cultural heritage, destruction, armed conflict, international criminal law, protection, international criminal courts.

References

Abtahi, H. (2001). The Protection of Cultural Property in Times of Armed Conflict: The Practise of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Harvard Human Rights Journa, 1-32.

Badar, M., & Higgins, N. (2017). Discussion Interrupted: The Destruction and Protection of Cultural Property under International Law and Islamic Law - the Case of Prosecutor v. Al Mahdi. International Criminal Law Review, 486-516.

Bensouda, F. (2016, March 1). Trying individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression. Retrieved August 16, 2023, from International Criminal Court: https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-prosecutor-international-criminal-court-fatou-bensouda-opening-confirmation-charges

Bokova, I. (2017). The Penal Protection of Cultural Property. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from UNESCO Digital Library: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260071

Đorđević, Đ. (2013). Criminal offences against cultural property in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia. Contemporary organized crime and terrorism, 283-304.

Fenrick, W. (1999). Article 8 war crimes. In O. Triffterer, Commentarz on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (p. 214). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

Francioni, F., & Lenzerini, F. (2003). The Destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan and International Law. European Journal of International Law, 619-651.

Gerstenblith, P. (2016). International Criminal Law - Rome Statute - International Criminal Court Imposes First Sentence for War Crime of Attacking Cultural Heritage - Prosecutor v. Al Mahdi. Harvard Law Review, 1978-1985.

Jončić, V., & Petrović, M. (2012). Ograničenja međunarodnopravne zaštite kulturnih dobara u oružanim sukobima. Srpska politička misao, 149-168.

Lostal, M. (2017). The Misplaced Emphasis on the Intangible Dimension of Cultural Heritage in the Al Mahdi Case at the ICC. Inter Gentes, 45-58.

Manacorda, S. (2011). Criminal Law Protection of Cultural Heritage: An International Perspective. In S. Manacorda, & D. Chappell, Crime in the art and antiquities world: illegal trafficking in cultural property (pp. 17-48). New York: Springer.

Marković, I. (2017). Uništenje nepokretnih kulturnih dobara - zaštita prema međunarodnom krivičnom pravu. Srpska politička misao, 131-147.

Merryman, J. H. (1986). Two Ways of Thinking About Cultural Property. The American Journal of International Law, 831-853.

Mrljić, R. (2009). UNESCO and the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict. Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu, 785-822.

Obšust, K. (n.d.). The Hague Convention for the protection of cultural property and weaknesses of its implementation in practice: the Case of Iraq. Retrieved August 8, 2023, from https://platformaugrozenabastina.arhivvojvodine.org.rs/haska-konvencija-o-zastiti-kulturne-bastine-i-slabosti-njene-implementacije-u-praksi-slucaj-iraka/

Author (2021). Criminal law protection of the environment in the legislation of the Republic of Serbia and standards of the European Union. In S. Soković, Harmonization of the legal system of Serbia within European Union standards (pp. 297-312). Kragujevac: Faculty of Law.

Author (2022). Challenges in defining ecocide under European Union law. In S. Soković, Harmonization of the legal system of Serbia within European Union standards (pp. 369-380). Kragujevac: Faculty of Law, University of Kragujevac.

Author, Soković, S., & Banović, B. (2023). International criminal law and international criminal justice objectives and purpose of punishment in internationa lcriminal law theory and practice. Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law, 67-92.

Sterio, M. (2017). Individual Criminal Responsibility for the Destruction of Religious and Historic Buildings: The Al Mahdi Case. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 63-73.

Tesla, M. (2016). Međunarodnopravna zaštita kulturnih dobara u slučaju oružanog sukoba i okupacije. Strani pravni život, 217-229.

Vrdoljak, A. F. (2017). The criminalisation of the intentional destruction of cultural heritage. In T. Bergin, & E. Orlando, Forging a Socio-Legal Approach to Environmental Harms (pp. 237-266). London, New York: Routledge.

Wierczynska, K., & Jakubowski, A. (2017). Individual Responsibility for Deliberate Destruction of Cultural Heritage: Contextualizing the ICC Judgment in the Al-Mahdi Case. Chinese Journal of International Law, 695-721.

Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907.

Convention for the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict, the Hague, 14th May 1954.

Elements of Crimes, adopted at the 2010 Review Conference are replicated from the Official Records of the Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Kampala, 31 May -11 June 2010.

Law on ratification of the Convention for the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict, "Sl. list FNRJ - Međunarodni ugovori i drugi sporazumi", br. 4/56.

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law applicable in Armed Conflicts, 8 June 1977.

Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, United Nations, Security Council, Resolution no. 827, adopted on 25 May 1993.

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, adopted at a diplomatic conference in Rome, Italy on 17 July 1998 and entered into force on 1 July 2002.

(Nuremberg), I. M. (1946, October 1). Judgment. Retrieved August 7, 2023, from https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/45f18e/pdf/

The Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaškić, IT-95-14-T (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia March 3, 2000).

The Prosecutor v. Dario Kordić & Mario Čerkez, IT-95-14/2-T (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia February 26, 2001).

The Prosecutor v. Miodrag Jokić, IT-01-42/1-S (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia March 18, 2004).

The Prosecutor v. Pavle Strugar, IT-01-42-T (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia January 31, 2005).

The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga, ICC-01/04-01/07 (International Criminal Court May 23, 2014).

The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, ICC-01/12-01/15 (International Criminal Court September 27, 2016).

Downloads

Published

2024-04-29

Issue

Section

Etiology, Phenomenology and Trends of Contemporary Crime