MODEL OF FIELD TRAINING REDESIGN AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND POLICE STUDIES BASED ON STUDENT EVALUATION
Keywords:
Redesign of the study program, field training, student evaluation, optimal study programAbstract
Purpose: To develop, in addition to institutional evaluation, the need for summative evaluation as one of the elements of improving the didactic-methodical standard of teaching in higher police education, a student evaluation model has been designed to systematically and in an organized manner monitor the implementation and project measures for improving field training as a form of special forms of teaching at the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies.
Methods and Findings: From 2016 to 2019, 416 students participated. Men (229) were statistically significantly higher (χ2=4,240; df=1; p=0.039) than women (187). The level of acquired knowledge was rated at 3.73±0.68. The overall impression of field training was 3.68±0.67. The formation of an assessment of the level of acquired knowledge and acquired skills and the overall impression of field training statistically significant (p<0,001) has a common influence on the way of studying and years of training. The distribution of the relative frequencies of the most common open response groups is: 124 students (29.8%) declared for the longer duration of the training; objections to poor personal equipment were made by 70 students (16.1%); 58 students suggested more practical exercise (14%); 30 students proposed the introduction into training of new technical means of the police (7.2%); 21 students proposed preparatory training in Belgrade (5%); etc., while only one student replied that he was not interested in field training (0.2%).
Value: Based on the analyzed results, a redesign of the field training for the academic year 2022/2023 was carried out, which included almost all the suggestions of students. The results of this redesign have yet to be recorded and analyzed, but it is already clear that the model of a redesign of program contents at the UCIPS based on the evaluation of both students and training contractors, as well as the future employer (the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia), is the right way to model the optimal study program.
Keywords: redesign of the study program, field training, student evaluation, optimal study program.
References
Anđelković-Pešić M., Janković-Milić V., Stanković J. (2012). Ocena kvaliteta nastavnog procesa u visokom obrazovanju. Nastava i vaspitanje, 61(1), str. 51-66.
Biersteker, T. (2016). Self-Assessment Rewiews and External Evaluation Exercises in IR Education. International Studies Review, 341-345
Biggs, J. B. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University – What the Student Does (4th edition). Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Brus, S., Komljenovič, J., Mac Síthigh, D., Noope, G. & Tück, C. (2007). Student Participation in QA: Strengths and Challenges. In L. Bollaert, S. Brus, B. Curvale, L. Harvey, E. Helle, H. T. Jensen, J. Komljenovič, A. Orphanides & A. Sursock (Eds.), Embedding Quality Culture in Higher Education (pp. 53–58). Brussels: European University Association asbl.
Byrne, M., Flood, B. (2003). Assessing the Teaching Quality of Accounting Programmes: an evaluation of the Course Experience Questionnaire Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp.135-145.
Castelluccio, C. & Lanfranco, M. (2006). Quality Assurance in United Kingdom Higher Education. A Case Study: The London Metropolitan University. In C. Orsinger (Ed.), Assessing Quality in European Higher Education Institutions (pp. 23–50). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
De Rijcke, S., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use – a literature review. Research Evaluation, 25(2): 161-169.
Despotović, M., (2010). Razvoj kurikuluma u stručnom obrazovanju, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd.
Franceško, M., Kodžopeljić, J i Mihić, V. (2002). Neki socio-demografski i psihološki korelati motiva postignuća. Psihologija, 35 (1-2), 65-79.
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods. Further Education Unit. Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic.
Gurova, G., Piattoeva, N., & Takala, T. (2015). Quality of Education and Its Evaluation: An Analysis of the Russian Academic Discussion. European Education, 47, pp. 346-364.
Handal, G. (2003). Studenska evaluacija nastave – Priručnik za studente i nastavnike visokoškolskih ustanova, (prevod), Ministarstvo prosvete i sporta Republike Srbije, Beograd.
Herman, L. J., Morris, L. L. & Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1987). Evaluation Handbook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Holland, P. (2005), „The Case for Expanding Standards for Teacher Evaluation to Include an Instructional Supervision Perspective“, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 18: 67–77.
Jevremov D, T., Lungulov, B., Dinić, B.. (2016). Zadovoljstvo studenata kvalitetom nastave-efekti godine studija i akademskog postignuća. Nastava i vaspitanje, 65(3), str. 491-508.
Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level-model. Training & Development, 1, 54-57.
Maksimović, J., Cenić, D. (2013). Akciona istraživanja u nastavi i kvalitet vaspitno-obrazovanog procesa. U: Tematski zbornik radova, Naučni skup „Nastava i učenje“ – kvalitet vaspitno-obrazovnog procesa, Učiteljski fakultet u Užicu, 8. novembar 2013, str. 309–318.
Matijević, M. (2005). Evaluacija u odgoju i obrazovanju. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 2(2): 279-298.
Milojević S., (2010). Optimizacija modela posebnih oblika nastave na Kriminalističko-policijskoj akademiji, Bezbednost, 51(3), str. 25-55.
Milojević S., Janković, B., (2014). „Uticaj terenske obuke na osposobljenost studenata Kriminalističko-policijske akademije za primenu vatrenog oružja kao sredstva prinude“, Tematski zbornik radova nacionalnog značaja „Struktura i funkcionisanje policijske organizacije (III)“, Kriminalističko-policijska akademija, Beograd, str. 145-148.
Milojević S., Vučković G., Janković B., (2011). Analiza stavova studenata kriminalističko-policijske akademije o efektivnosti terenske obuke u letnjim uslovima, Bezbednost, 52(2), str. 46-65.
Milojević, S., Janković, B., (2012). Geneza terenske obuke kao posebnog oblika nastave na Kriminalističko-policijskoj akademiji, Tematski zbornik radova „Struktura i funkcionisanje policijske organizacije“
Milojević, S., Janković, B., Petrović, D., (2013). Uticaj osnovnih parametra populacije studenata Kriminalističko-policijske akademije na evaluaciju terenske obuke u letnjim uslovima“, Tematski zbornik radova „Struktura i funkcionisanje policijske organizacije (II)“, str.
Milojković, B., (2001). Didactical and methodical standard of teching topografy at Police academy in Belgrade. Science-security-police, 7(2), str. 83-101.
Milojković, B., (2011). CONTRIBUTION OF POLICE TOPOGRAPHY TO DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER POLICE EDUCATION IN SERBIA, In Procesiding, International Scientific Conference “Archibald Reiss Days“, 03.-04. 03. 2011., Academy of criminalistic and police studies, Belgrade. str. 89-98
Mužić, V. (1999). Uvod u metodologiju istraživanja odgoja i obrazovanja. Zagreb: Educa.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. California: Sage Publications.
Richardson, T. E. J. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 387-415.
Scott, D. (1998). Qualitative approaches to evaluations of health-promoting activities. U: D. Scott and R. Weston (ur.). Evaluating Health Promotion (str. 31-49). Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
Španja, S. (2019). Evaluacija kao pedagoški fenomen. Školski vjesnik, 68(1), 261-278.
Stančić Milan (2015). Nastavničke refleksije o evaluaciji sopstvenog rada. Nastava i vaspitanje, vol. 64, br. 4, str. 697-713.
Tot, D. (2013). Kultura samovrednovanja škole i učitelja. Zagreb: Učiteljski fakultet sveučilišta u Zagrebu
Tyler, R. W. (1989). Educational evaluation: Classic works. Boston: Kluwer.
Vizek-Vidović, V., Vlahović-Štetić, V., Rijavec, M., Miljković, D. (2003). Psihologija obrazovanja. Zagreb: IEP-VERN.
Wills, M. (1994). Managing the training process: putting the basics into practice. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(6), 4-28.
Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J. & Kruyen, P. (2014). Short Scales – Five Misunderstandings and Ways to Oversome Them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), pp. 185–189.
Уредба о стручном оспособљавању и усавршавању у Министарству унутрашњих послова: Службени гласник Р Србије, 42/2017-5, 56/2018-11, 34/2019-10, 11/2020-9, 24/2021-34, 49/2022-18, 54/2023-5.
