AN INSIGHT INTO THE PERCEPTION, BEHAVIOR AND IMPACT OF DISINFORMATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE
Keywords:
disinformation, digital age, social networks, metadata, educationAbstract
Purpose
This thorough investigation delves into the widespread occurrence of disinformation and the various elements that impact individuals' capacity to identify and counter it. The primary objective of this research is to aid in the formulation of successful tactics and educational initiatives geared towards bolstering media literacy and fostering critical thinking abilities when confronted with disinformation.
Design/Methods/Approach
The design/methods/approach section of the study outlines the methodology employed to investigate the phenomenon of disinformation among 278 participants, predominantly comprising students and employees associated with the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The study aimed to delve into participants' experiences, perceptions, and behaviors concerning disinformation, shedding light on their awareness levels and interaction with disinformation across digital platforms. The primary method utilized in this study was the administration of surveys to the participants. Surveys are structured questionnaires designed to gather specific information from respondents in a standardized format. In this case, the surveys likely included questions related to participants' experiences with encountering disinformation, their understanding of what constitutes disinformation, the frequency of their internet usage, and their engagement with social media platforms where disinformation is commonly disseminated. Additionally, correlation analyses were employed as part of the methodology. Correlation analysis is a statistical technique used to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between two or more variables. In this study, correlation analyses likely examined the relationship between various factors such as participants' awareness levels of disinformation, their frequency of internet use, and their engagement with social media platforms. This analysis helps identify any patterns or associations between different variables, providing insights into how these factors may influence one another.
Overall, the combination of surveys and correlation analyses allowed the researchers to collect comprehensive data on participants' experiences, perceptions, and behaviors related to disinformation. By employing these methods, the study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of the prevalence and impact of disinformation in the digital age, particularly among individuals associated with the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
Findings
Results indicate that a majority of participants feel informed about the dangers of disinformation, yet there are variations in their confidence in distinguishing fake news. Gender differences were observed, with male participants more likely to use methods to verify information online. Participants who prioritize online privacy and believe in their knowledge about disinformation are more inclined to use verification methods. Furthermore, individuals who perceive a greater impact of disinformation on society and its prevalence in the media are more likely to verify information.
In our study, 278 individuals participated, comprising 63.3% male and 36.7% female participants, with an average age of 29.29 years (standard deviation = 6.36). All the participants were enrolled at the Polytechnic of Criminology and Public Security, with 69.9% pursuing the Professional study of criminology and 30.1% enrolled in the Specialist graduate study. Additionally, 74.8% of the participants were employed by the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Among the police officers in the sample, who had an average tenure of 6.23 years (standard deviation = 5.37), 23.4% were engaged in basic police work, 18% in criminal work, 15.1% in border duties, 8.6% in traffic-related roles, and 5.1% in the intervention police unit.
Research Limitations/Implications
The study's limitations include a sample bias towards younger participants and the absence of measures related to personality traits and cognitive styles. Future research should incorporate a more diverse age range and explore individual differences to better understand the mechanisms influencing behaviors and beliefs related to disinformation.
Practical Implications
The findings suggest the importance of enhancing media literacy and critical thinking skills, with a focus on privacy concerns and promoting awareness of disinformation's societal impact. Educational resources and courses, such as those available in the Croatian language, offer practical tools for recognizing and combating disinformation.
Originality/Value
This study makes a significant contribution to our understanding of disinformation by exploring various dimensions of this complex phenomenon. By examining individual factors, media literacy, and societal impact, the research provides a comprehensive perspective on the challenges posed by disinformation in the digital age.
Firstly, the study delves into individual factors that influence how people perceive and interact with disinformation. By investigating participants' experiences, perceptions, and behaviors related to disinformation, the research sheds light on the psychological and cognitive aspects involved. Understanding these individual factors is crucial for devising effective strategies to combat disinformation, as it helps identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for intervention.
Secondly, the study underscores the importance of media literacy in mitigating the effects of disinformation. By assessing participants' awareness levels and engagement with disinformation across digital platforms, the research highlights the role of education in empowering individuals to critically evaluate information sources and discern fact from fiction. This emphasis on media literacy aligns with broader efforts to promote digital literacy and critical thinking skills in an increasingly interconnected world.
Lastly, the study examines the societal impact of disinformation, emphasizing its implications for public trust, democratic processes, and social cohesion. By uncovering the prevalence and impact of disinformation among participants, the research underscores the need for collective action to address this growing threat. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and researchers seeking to develop targeted interventions and educational initiatives aimed at combating disinformation and fostering a more informed and resilient society.
This study contributes to a multifaceted understanding of disinformation by exploring individual factors, media literacy, and societal impact. By highlighting the need for tailored educational initiatives and collective action, the research offers valuable guidance for stakeholders seeking to address the challenges posed by disinformation in the digital age.
References
Abrams, Z. (2021). Controlling the spread of misinformation. Monitor on Psychology, 52(2). Dostupno na: https://www.apa.org/monitor/2021/03/controlling-misinformation
Almenar, E., Aran-Ramspott, S., Suau, J., & Masip, P. (2021). Gender Differences in Tackling Fake News: Different Degrees of Concern, but Same Problems. Media and Communication, 9(1), 229-238. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3523
Arin, K.P., Mazrekaj, D. & Thum, M. (2023) „Ability of detecting and willingness to share fake news“. Sci Rep 13, 7298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34402-6
Barthel, M., Mitchell A., & Holcomb, J. (2016) “Many Americans Believe Fake News Is Sowing Confusion”, Pew Research Center, Dostupno na: https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/
Begović, P. i Labaš, D. (2021) Medijske navike, povjerenje publike i lažne vijesti u doba koronavirusa COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 6 (1), 6 – 28. DOI: 10.22522/cmr20210162
Berify. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://berify.com/
Brown, A. et al. (2022). Extensions and Security Features in Modern Browsers. Journal of Cybersecurity, 17(3), 112-125.
Brown, A. et al. (2022). Malware Detection Techniques. Journal of Cybersecurity, 15(2), 78-91.
Bryanov, K., & Vziatysheva, V. (2021). „Determinants of individuals' belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news“. PloS one, 16(6), e0253717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253717
Catchvideo. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://catchvideo.net/
Ciboci, L., Kanižaj, I., Labaš, D. (2018) „Kako prepoznati dezinformacije i lažne vijesti – Razvoj medijske pismenosti“. Agencija za elektroničke medije i UNICEF. Zagreb. Dostupno na: https://www.medijskapismenost.hr/wp-content/ uploads/2018/04/lazne-vijesti.pdf
Clark, L. et al. (2021). Plagiarism Detection in Digital Content. Digital Ethics Review, 10(4), 112-125.
Clideo. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clideo.com/
Dejanović, R. (2020). Priručnik za provjeru informacija iz medija. Društvo za zaštitu novinarskih autorskih prava. Zagreb. Dostupno na:https://dznap.hr/wp content/uploads/2020/03/PRIRUCNIK-ZA-PROVJERU-INFORMACIJA-IZMEDIJA.pdf
Ecker, U.K.H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J. et al. (2022) „The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction“. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 13–29 Dostupno na: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
European Commission (2018) "Tackling disinformation online: a European approach. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions". Available at: https://eur-lex. europa.eu/legal-content/HR/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0236
European Commission. (n.d.). "Fake News and Disinformation Online." Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/fake_news_and_disinformation_online.pdf
FlexClip. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.flexclip.com/
Garcia, S. et al. (2020). Web Archiving: Methods and Challenges. Journal of Information Science, 25(3), 45-58.
Google Images. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://images.google.com/
Gottfried, J. & Grieco, E. (2018) „Younger Americans are better than older Americans at telling factual news statements from opinions“. Pew Research Center, Dostupno na: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/10/23/younger-americans-are-better-than-older-americans-at-telling-factual-news-statements-from-opinions/
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science advances, 5(1), eaau4586. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
Guy, T. F. (2024). "Combating Disinformation: A Methodical Approach." Journal of Information Ethics, 12(3), 45-58.
Guy, T. F. (2024). Enhancing Content Evaluation and Verification. Journal of Digital Information, 12(3), 45-61.
Guy, T. F. (2024). How to Spot Fake News and Verify Information Online: Essential Skills for Evaluating Sources and Detecting Lies in the Era of Misinformation. (n.p.): Amazon Digital Services LLC - Kdp.
Holy, M.; Borčić, N.: Novinarski diskurs na portalima i Twitteru - medijski poligon borbe medijske pismenosti i lažnih vijesti?, Medijska istraživanja Vol. 29, No. 1, str. 37-60, 2023.
InVID Verification Plugin. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.invid-project.eu/tools-and-services/invid-verification-plugin/
Jaiman, A, (2022), Deepfakes & Synthetic Media: Humanity at the Edge of an Uncanny Valley Kindle Edition, July 28, 2022, England.
Jiman, A. (2022). "The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Disinformation." Artificial Intelligence Review, 28(3), 301-315.
Jiman, A. (2022). The Impact of Synthetic Media on Disinformation. Communications of the ACM, 65(8), 36-40.
Johnson, L., et al. (2021). "Emerging Trends in Disinformation Campaigns." International Journal of Communication, 25(4), 112-128.
Jones, K. et al. (2021). Domain Analysis in Software Engineering. Software Engineering Journal, 18(1), 23-35.
Jones, M. et al. (2023). The Role of Browser Extensions in Combatting Disinformation. Digital Security Review, 8(2), 45-58.
Kapwing. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.kapwing.com/
Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S.J. et al.(2021) „Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA“. Nat Hum Behav 5, 337–348. Dostupno na: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1
Metadata2Go. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.metadata2go.com/
Milković, M., Samardžija, J., Ognjan, M.: Primjena blockchain tehnologije u medijskoj ekologiji, Medijska istraživanja, , Vol. 26 No. 1, (str. 29-52), 2020.
Miller, D. et al. (2018). Understanding Malware Behavior. Cybersecurity Insights, 5(3), 102-115.
Pennycook, G. & Rand, D., G. (2021), The psychology of fake news. TiCS, 25 (5), 388-402, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Police Academy Research. (2023). "Recommendations for Content Verification in the Digital Age." Police Academy Journal, 10(1), 78-92.
Police Academy, Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Croatia. (n.d.). Course Opening: Understanding the Foundations. Unpublished manuscript.
Popovac, J., Gavran, V.: Procjena utjecaja pandemije bolesti COVID-19 na poslovanje elektroničkih medija u Republici Hrvatskoj, Medijska istraživanja, Vol. 27 No. 2, str. 127-162, 2021.
SmallSEOTools. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://smallseotools.com/
Smith, J. et al. (2023). Domain Information Retrieval Techniques. International Journal of Information Retrieval, 30(2), 55-68.
Smith, J., et al. (2020). "Understanding Disinformation in the Digital Age." Journal of Media Studies, 15(2), 45-60.
SnapWonders. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://snapwonders.com/
Taylor, R. et al. (2020). Blacklist Checks for Email Security. Journal of Email Protection, 12(4), 89-102.
UNHCR: Using Social Media in Community Based Protection, A Guide: January 2021, https://www.unhcr.org/innovation/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Using-Social-Media-in-CBP.pdf
Wilson, M. et al. (2019). Image Extraction Methods. Digital Image Processing Review, 8(1), 34-47.