THE SOCIAL CLIMATE OF THE CLOSED PRISON IN ZENICA IN THE PERIOD FROM 1993 TO 2016: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY

Authors

  • Alisabri Šabani University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Criminalistics, Criminology and Security Studies

Keywords:

prison, repression, disorganization, deprivations, prison code

Abstract

The social climate of the closed prison in Zenica in the period from 1993 to 2016: a longitudinal study

 

Šabani Alisabri

Faculty of Criminalistics, Criminology and Security Studies at the University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina asabani@fkn.unsa.ba

Purpose

The social climate of prisons is considered to be an important scientific interest (Moos, 1974; Ilijić, 2021) because it reveals latent relationships, processes and events within the prison community. The universe of variables of the social climate of prisons is stratified, and the most frequent events - variables are, from a view of prisoners, repression, disorganization, prison code and deprivation.

Design / Methods / Approach

As the basic instrument, we used the revised and adapted CIES (Correctional Institutions Environment Scale Manual) created by Moos (Moos, 1974) for different types of prisons. The survey technique proved to be the most appropriate, and the instrument contained 39 items in a Likert format. The samples of the interviewed prisoners were representative in relation to the statistical group of prisoners serving their sentences.

Findings

The paper analyses the results of testing of the social climate of the closed prison in Zenica in 1993, 1994, 1997 and 2016, which satisfies the requirement for longitudinality. We found that the values ​​of the social climate subdimensions vary between the war period (1993 and 1994) and the post-war period (1997). As a comparative criterion, we took the measurement of the social climate from the 2016 period. The subdimensions of repression and deprivation proved to be the most stable and pointed to the fact that these are structural features of closed prisons, regardless of the environmental conditions (war or peace).

Originality / Value

The originality of the work is reflected in the fact that the social climate of a closed prison was measured in the samples of the mentioned periods, and that the findings can be used for comparative research conducted in other prisons. Research of this type can help to be used for more humane functioning of prisons, especially in terms of managing security risks in prisons, creating re-educational treatments and reducing recidivism.

Key words: prison, repression, disorganization, deprivations, prison code

About the Author

Full professor of the Sociology, Social Pathology, Sociology of Prison Community courses.

 

References

Ajduković, D., & Kulenović, A. (1989). Konstrukcija skale psihosocijalne klime u penalnim ustanovama. Penološke teme, 3-4, 207-213.

Bogojević S. (1991). Konstrukcija skale psihološke atmosfere zatvora KPD Zenica. Zenica: KPD Zenica. Interno izdanje.

Bowers, J.K. & Johnson S.D. (2016). Situational Prevention. in: What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation: Lessons from Systematic Reviews. ed. by Weisburd D., Farrington D. P. &Gill C.. Springer.

Cavadino M., Dignan J. & Mair (2013). The penal System: An Introduction. 5th edition. Sage.

Cressey, D. R. (1965). Prison organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 123-169). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Crewe,B.& Liebling A. (2017). Reconfiguring Penal Power in The Oxford Handbook in Criminology. sixth edition, ed. bY Liebling, A., Maruna, S. & McAra L, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goffman, E. (1961). On the characteristics of total institutions. In D. R. Cressey (Ed.), The world of the prison: Studies in institutional organization and change. (pp. 1-124). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Ignjatović Đ. (2007) Kriminologija (osmo izdanje).Beograd: Dosije

Ilijić, Lj. (2016) Uticaj obrazovanja i profesionalnog osposobljavanja na redukciju rizika recidivizma kod osuđenih lica. Doktorska disertacija. Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju, Univerzitet u Beogradu.

Ilijić, Lj. (2017) Praktične implikacije savremenog penološkog pristupa na institucionalni tretman osuđenika – osvrt na tretman zavisnika. U: Macanović, Nebojša, Jagoda Petrović, Goran Jovanić (ur.), Društvene devijacije – Anomija društva i posljedice, Univerzitet u Banja Luci, Fakultet političkih nauka, s. 362‒371.

Ilijić, Lj. (2021) Zatvorska socijalna klima – pojam, faktori i značaj zatvorske socijalne klime. Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, 40(2-3), 59‒76. https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi202123024

Loughran A.T. & Mulvey P.E. 2011) Estimating Treatment Effects:Matching Quantification to the Question. in: Handbook of Quantative Criminology. eds. by Piquero R.A. &Weisburd D., Springer.

Moos, R. H., & Houts, P. S. (1968). Assessment of the social atmospheres of psychiatric wards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73(6), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026600

Pavičević, O. Lj., Ilijić, A., & Batričević, A. (2024). Moralna i socijalna klima u zatvorima. Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.

Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (1970). Freedom of choice and behavior in a physical setting. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Man and his physical settings (pp. 169-173). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Šabani, A. (1999). Zatvoreničko društvo i zajednica(studija slučaja KPD-Zenica). Doktorska disertacija. Univerzitet u Sarajevu: Fakultet političkih nauka.

Šabani, A. (2023). Безбедносни дијалози / Security Dialogues: The Prisoner’s Code as an Exchange Capital in the Functioning of the Close-Type Correctional Institute in Zenica, BiH. 14(2), 176-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47054/SD23142

Šabani, A. (2024). Analysis of disciplinary offenses and disciplinary punishment in the closed penitentiary in Zenica in the period from 2020 to 2022. In Conference Proceedings of International Significance (Belgrade: University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies. pp. 286-303.

Stern, G. G. (1967). People in Context: The Measurement of Environmental Interaction in School and Society (Vols. 1-2). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.

Street, D., Vintner, R. D., & Perron, C. (1966). Organizations for treatment: A comparative study of institutions for delinquents. New York, NY: Free Press.

Sykes, G., & Messinger, S. (1960). The inmate social system. In Theoretical studies in social organization of the prison (pp. 5-19). New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.

Tomanović, S. (2020). Longitudinalno kvalitativno istraživanje u praksi: prednosti, dileme i rešenja. Sociologija, LXII (1), 8-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC2001008T

Walker, J. T., & Drawve, G. R. (2018). Foundation of crime analysis: Data, analyses, and mapping. Routledge.

Wenk, A. E., & Moos, R. H. (1972). Social climates in prison: An attempt to conceptualize and measure environmental factors in total institutions. Crime and Delinquency, 4(4), 591-621.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-25

Issue

Section

Etiology, Phenomenology and Trends of Contemporary Crime