INVISIBLE HARMS, ELUSIVE JUSTICE: UNMASKING THE EVIDENTIARY AND LEGAL CHALLENGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME PROSECUTION
Keywords:
environmental crime, criminal justice, prosecution, forensic evidence, capacity buildingAbstract
Purpose: The paper explores the multifaceted challenges associated with detecting and proving environmental crime in Serbia, set against the backdrop of evolving European standards and good practices. It aims to identify legal, procedural, and institutional weaknesses that hinder effective enforcement. Despite its growing prevalence and severe ecological and societal impact, environmental crime remains chronically under-investigated and under-prosecuted worldwide and in Serbia.
Design/Method/Approach: The paper combines doctrinal legal research with comparative legal methodology. It examines Serbia’s caselaw, legal instruments, and prosecutorial practices, and institutional setup in Serbia, and compares these with selected European models. Sources include legal instruments, policy documents, interviews with practitioners, and data from enforcement agencies.
Findings: The research reveals persistent weakness in Serbia, including vague definitions of environmental crimes, lack of prosecutorial specialization, poor use of environmental forensics, and limited cross-sector coordination. The low number of indictments and convictions points to an enforcement gap. In contrast, European good practices demonstrate the value of multidisciplinary investigative teams, specialized environmental units with prosecution services, and the use of scientific expertise to establish causality and harm.
Originality/Value: The paper offers a focused, context-specific analysis of Serbia’s challenges in prosecuting environmental crime, enriched by comparative insights from the EU. It provides actionable recommendations, including legislative amendments, capacity building for prosecutors and inspectors, and the adoption of mechanisms for joint investigation and expert collaboration.
References
Alimpić, M. (2022). Krivična dela protiv životne sredine – Krivično zakonodavstvo Srbije i međunarodni pravni standardi – usaglašenost ili ne? Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 94(4), 1314-1331.
Bisschop, L. & van Wingerde, K. (2022). Transnational organized environmental crime. In Allum, F., Gilmour, S. (Eds.) Routledge Handbook on Transnational Organized Crime. 2nd edition, Routledge.
Billiet, C. & M., Rousseau, S. (2017). Environmental Inspectors and Public Prosecutors. Is Sharing Information Always Useful? In. Maljen-Dubois, S. (ed.) The Effectiveness of Environmental Law, Intersentia, 271-293
CCPE. (2022). Opinion No. 17 (2022) of the Consultative Council of European Prosecutors (CCPE) on the role of prosecutors in the protection of the environment. Council of Europe.
CEE Legal Matters. (2025). Key changes in Serbia’s new environmental assessment laws. https://ceelegalmatters.com/by-practice/28372-key-changes-in-serbia-s-new-environmental-assessment-laws
Drenovak-Ivanović, M., & Đorđević, S., & Važić, S. (2015). Pravni instrumenti ekološke zaštite – građanskopravna i krivičnopravna zaštita, OEBS, Beograd.
Directive (EU) 2024/1203 of the European Parliament and the Council of 11 April 2024 on the protection of the environmental criminal law replacing Directives 2008/99/EC and 2009/123/EC.
European Commission. (2024). Serbia 2024 Report – Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions 2024 - Communication on EU enlargement policy, Brussels, 30.10.2024. SWD(2024) 695 final.
Faure, M., & Lu, M. (2024). European environmental criminal law and enforcement. In Smith, S. L., Sahramäki, I. (Eds.) Research Handbook on Environmental Crimes and Criminal Enforcement, Edward Elgar Publishing, 324-345.
Faure, M. (2017). The revolution in environmental criminal law in Europe. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 35, 321-356.
Faure, M. (2010). Effective, proportional and dissuasive penalties in the implementation of the Environmental Crime and Shipsource Pollution Directive: Questions and challenges. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 19(6), 256–273.
Faure, M., & Svatikova, K. (2012). Criminal or administrative law to protect the environment? Evidence from Western Europe. Journal of Environmental Law, 24(2), 253–286.
Faure, M., & Heine, G. (2005). Criminal Enforcement of Environmental Law in the European Union. Kluwer Law International.
Gudin, F. (2024). EU rule of law actors and the environmental crime directive: upholding the law in a new era of ecological challenges. ERA Forum. 25, 339-355.
Jović, V., & Milutinović, O., & Kvrgić, G., & Manojlović, D. (2021). Legal Protection of Environments in the Republic of Serbia. Economics of Agriculture. 68(2), 517-530.
Kostić, J. (2025). Analiza institucionalnih ograničenja javnog tužilaštva u procesuiranju krivičnih dela protiv životne sredine u Srbiji. YUCOM.
Kostić, J., & Matić Bošković, M. (2025) Can Criminal Law be an Effective Response for Environmental Disasters Caused by Mining?, International conference, Franca (SP, Brazil) on August 22 and 23, 2024, 49-74
Kostić, J. Ž. (2024). The challenges related to whistleblowing in the field of environmental crime prevention. NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 29(3), 215–226.
Matić Bošković, M., & Kostić, J. (2024) Track record in fight against corruption in Serbia – How to increase effectiveness of prosecution? Journal of University of Latvia. Law, 17, 5-20.
Matić Bošković, M., & Kostić, J. (2023) Criminal Law as an Effective Tool to Protection of Environment?, In. Bratislava Legal Forum, Current Challenges of Criminal Law: proceedings, Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law, 74-91.
Мatić Bošković, M., (2022a). Krivično procesno pravo EU. Institute of criminological and sociological research. Belgrade.
Мatić Bošković, M., (2022b). (ed.). Javno tužilaštvo i zaštita životne sredine – Normativni okvir i analiza problema u primeni. Udruženje tužilaca Srbije, Beograd.
Nicović, N. (2025). Analiza inspekcijske kontrole i nadzora u oblasti krivičnopravne zaštite životne sredine u Republici Srbiji. YUCOM.
Sina, S. (2015). Fighting Environmental Crime in Germany: A Country Report. Study in the framework of the EFFACE.
Stojanović, Z., & Bodrožić, I. (2025). Possibilities and Scope of Environmental Protection Through Criminal Law – the New Environment Crime Directive. NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 30(1), 1-19.
Škulić, M. (2024) Kriminalno pravo i adekvatnost zaštite životne sredine – međunarodni pravni standardi i suštinska krivična legislative Srbije – u skladu ili ne? Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine. 96( 4), 1036-1103.
Tak, P.J.P. (2008). The Dutch criminal justice system. Wolf Legal Publisher.
Uhlmann, D. M. (2014). Prosecutorial discretion and environmental crime. The Harvard environmental law review: HELR. 38(1), 159-216.
UNEP (2018). The State of Knowledge of Crimes that have Serious Impacts on the Environment.
UNEP & INTERPOL. (2016). The Rise of Environmental Crime: A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security. United Nations Environment Programme.
White, R. (2013). Environmental crime and problem-solving courts. Crime Law and Social Change, 59(3), 267-278
WWF Adria-Serbia (2022). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Tackling Wildlife crimes in Republic of Serbia – National Report, Study on Wildlife Crime from 2016-2020.
WWF Spain. (2022). Wildlife crime and its Prosecution. Analysis of the situation in Spain.
