THE “KLIMT AFFAIR” AND THE CHALLENGES OF COMPLEX CULTURAL HERITAGE PROTECTION
Keywords:
painting analysis, heritage protection, system theory, Gustav Klimt's African PrinceAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the shortcomings of the current system of cultural heritage protection in Hungary, based on the analysis of the “Klimt case”, which hit the international press in the spring of 2025, with the aim of exploring the interrelationship between the protection of a state's own cultural heritage and the security of the country. The authors make recommendations to inspire a more effective management of the challenges identified, highlighting the need for a systemic approach to the problem as outlined above. By analysing the “Klimt case”, they highlight the sensitive nature of the ownership and export of works of art as an area of cultural heritage protection.
Design/Method/Approach: The study focuses on Gustav Klimt's “The African Prince”, an unknown work from Hungary, which was released onto the international market, where it took only one year to be exhibited at TEFAF (The European Fine Art Foundation) art fair in Maastricht in March 2025 as Gustav Klimt's portrait of a West African prince. The painting was subsequently offered for sale by the Viennese art dealer Wienerroither & Kohlbacher for €15 million. The paper uses both general and specific scientific methods and procedures of logical conclusion, statistical, as well as a positivist legal method. The manner of research includes the selection and application of scientific methods, the selection of data and the scope of research.
Findings: The background to this is that the Hungarian authorities allowed the “unknown painting” to be delivered without recognising the significance of the painting and the “Gustav Klimt Nachlass” stamp on it, and without taking into account the results of the identification and examination of the artwork by the Painting Research Laboratory that verified the authencity of the painting. The laboratory carries out scientific research and documentation of paintings. The case is par excellence contrary to the Hungarian Heritage Protection Act (Act LXIV of 2001), which states that all works of art older than 50 years are subject to an export permit, and in the case of outstanding cultural value, the authority may refuse to grant a permanent export permit. The painting clearly fell into this category, but the painting examination file was not attached, which highlights the anomalies arising from its incompleteness.
Originality/Value: Going further, the Klimt case is not only noteworthy from a heritage protection perspective, but also from a restitution perspective, as it highlights the problematic nature of Hungarian restitution practice and the possibility of circumventing the system.
References
Čudan, A. & Major, G. (2024). Art Market in the Function of Criminal Profit Legalization. Contemporary Security Challenges and Strengthening the Resilience of the Countries of Southeast Europe.Skopje, ISSN 2671-3624, DOI 10.20544/ ICP.9.2.2.24. Volume IX, No 2. 99-115
Dossi, P (2008). Hype! Művészet és pénz. Budapest: Corvina
Frye, Brian L. (2021). NFTs & the Death of Art (April 19, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3829399 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3829399 (01.09.2025)
Gáspárdy, T. (2014). A kortárs művészet piaca a magyarországi magángalériákban. Doktori disszertáció. Sopron: Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem
Hudák, K. E. (2022). Régészeti leletek illegális feltárásának és kereskedelmének megakadályozása. Doktori értekezés. Budapest: Közszolgálati Egyetem
Kertész, L. (2018). Kortárs műgyűjtés. Kézikönyv művészetszeretőknek, műtárgyvásárlóknak, gyűjtőknek és befektetőknek. Budapest: Kortárs Műgyűjtő Akadémia
Lublóy, Z. (2021). A digitális tárgyalkotás elmélete és gyakorlata, alkotói szemmel, doktori értekezés. Budapest: Moholy-Nagy Művészeti Egyetem Doktori Iskola
Lukács, D. (2022). Az illegális műkincskereskedelem elleni küzdelem olasz modellje - a nemzetközi rendszer tükrében, párhuzamban a magyar struktúrával. Doktori értekezés. Budapest: Közszolgálati Egyetem.
Major, G. (2022). Mesterséges intelligencia, a személy autonómiája és jogi kihívások. Autonómia & Társadalom II(3) 53-68. DOI: 10.52895/AT.2022.2.3.4
Major, G. & Čudan, A. (2023). Integrity – Human Narrative of Corruption Prevention and/or AI-Based Legal Protection. XII International Scientific Conference, Belgrade,ISBN 978-86-7020-511-3, ISBN 978-86-7020-190-3, 315-323
Major, G., & Tomka, D. (2014). The Past in the Future – The Tourism of the Balkans through the Eyes of Anthropology. American Journal of Tourism Management, 3(1B) 64-68
Martos, G. (2011). Hogyan lehet csomót keresni a cápán? – avagy a műkereskedelem mint értékképző. Doktori disszertáció. Budapest: ELTE Bölcsésztudományi Kar
Merryman, J. H. (2009). Thinking about the Elgin Marbles: Critical Essays on Cultural Property, Art and Law. Kluwer Law International
Muldowney, S. (2015). The Art of valuing beautiful things. ANZIIF Magazine, 38(2) https://anziif.com/members-centre/the-journal-articles/volume-38/issue-2/the-art-ofvaluing-beautiful-things.
Prott, L. V. & O’Keefe, P. J. (1992). Law and the Cultural Heritage London: Butterworths
PwC (2016) Industry 4.0 - Building the digital enterprise. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
Sztermen, O. L. (2023). A Digitális műalkotások megjelenési kérdései: II. Dologi jogi kérdések. Miskolci Jogtudó. 1. 72-82.
Tainter, J. (1988). The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teszárik, E. & Váradi, K. (2020). A magyar festménypiac pénzügyi szemmel A magyar festménypiac pénzügyi szemmel. Közgazdasági Szemle LXVII(Dec) 1271–1298
Virág, J. K. (2012). Az illegális műkincskereskedelem nemzetközi vonatkozásai – Különös tekintettel a fegyveres konfliktusok okozta speciális körülményekre. Tanulmányok „A biztonság rendészettudományi dimenziói – változások és hatások” c. tudományos konferenciáról. Pécs: Pécsi Határőr Tudományos Közlemények XIII. 197-207
évi LXIV. törvény a kulturális örökség védelméről (HHP Act LXIV of 2001)
ICOM. (2021). Fighting Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods. Paris: International Council of Museums.
UNESCO. (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO
Council of Europe. (2005). Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (Faro Convention). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Palumbo, J. (2025). A long-lost Klimt painting of an African prince goes on show.CNN Style. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/19/style/lost-gustav-klimt-painting-african-prince/
Reyburn, S. (2025). Long-Lost Klimt Portrays African Prince. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/21/arts/design/rediscovered-klimt-african-prince.html
Was this largely unknown and long-missing Gustav Klimt work of a West African prince illegally smuggled out of Hungary?
