WHAT IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION?

A CASE FOR RE-CONCEPTUALIZATION

Authors

  • Ivana Damnjanović University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Science

Keywords:

terrorism, terrorist organization, lone wolf terrorism, leaderless resistance

Abstract

Purpose

The problems of defining terrorism have been widely discussed for decades within the academic community, political decision-makers, and legal scholars and practitioners alike. While some elements in the definition are more or less agreed upon, for example, political motivation and violence or the threat thereof, others are still disputed. Among these is the issue of perpetrators of terrorism, in several ways. One of them is certainly the question, “Can a state commit acts of terrorism?” More pressing, taking into account transformations of terrorism in the 21st century, may be the need to explore whether individuals can commit terrorism, or is the presence of an organization as a perpetrator a necessary feature of the very definition of the concept. The primary aim of this paper is to re-examine the concept of a terrorist organization and its implications for both the theoretical understanding of terrorism and the practical countermeasures against this threat. This will be done primarily, but not exclusively, from the perspective of political science.

Design/Methods/Approach

Drawing from an abundant body of scholarly literature on terrorism and terrorist organizations, this paper will endeavor to answer three separate research questions:

  1. What constitutes a terrorist organization, that is, when is it justified to qualify a group as a terrorist organization?
  2. Was there ever a scholarly consensus about the defining features of a terrorist organization, and has it changed in the 21st century?
  3. Is the presence of a terrorist organization behind the act of violence a necessary component of the definition of terrorism?

Findings

The main finding of this paper is that there is no universally accepted definition of a terrorist organization, nor is it clear that only acts of violence perpetrated by organizations can or should be designated as terrorism. The evolving nature of terrorism itself, perhaps accelerating in this century, suggests that the concept of terrorist organization and its relation to the concept of terrorism must be re-examined and re-conceptualized, for two main reasons. The first is the shift in the landscape of Islamist terrorism after 9/11 and subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, from tightly knit and hierarchical organizations such as al-Qaeda to more or less decentralized groups sharing ideology and goals but not operational data (increased accessibility and parallel evolution of the Internet has played significant role in this). While the concept of leaderless resistance was not invented by Islamists, it was widely adopted by them, as well as by violent groups with very different ideological backgrounds and political objectives. The other reason is the emergence and increase of so-called lone wolf terrorism, that is, a growing number of attacks perpetrated by individuals with no obvious link to any organization.

Originality/Value

The theoretical conceptualization of the terrorist organization as a distinct phenomenon is somewhat lacking, with empirical research and case studies accounting for the vast majority of scholarly literature on the subject. However, the answer to the question “What counts as a terrorist organization in the 21st century?” is not of strictly academic interest. Given that many national penal codes list membership in a terrorist organization as an offence per se, it has serious practical implications. Moreover, to efficiently counter contemporary terrorism, it is necessary to understand its actors and the ways in which they organize and operate.

References

Atwan, A. B. (2015). Islamic State: The digital caliphate (Kindle ed.). University of California Press.

Awasthi, S. (2025). Jihadi use of artificial intelligence: A growing threat in the digital age. Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/jihadi-use-of-artificial-intelligence-a-growing-threat-in-the-digital-age

Azani, E. (2013). The hybrid terrorist organization: Hezbollah as a case study. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36(11), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2013.832113

Baconi, T. (2022). Hamas contained: A history of Palestinian resistance. Stanford University Press.

Bakker, E., & De Graaf, B. (2011). Preventing lone wolf terrorism: Some CT approaches addressed. Perspectives on Terrorism, 5(5–6), 43–50.

Beam, L. (1992). Leaderless resistance. The Seditionist, 12. https://www.louisbeam.com/leaderless.htm

Berger Hobson, R., & Moghadam, A. (2024). Terrorism, guerrilla, and the labeling of militant groups. Terrorism and Political Violence, 36(4), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2023.2183052

Bodrožić, I. P. (2017). Terrorism as a contemporary category of national criminal law. Vojno delo, 69(7), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1707493B

Chen, T. (2012). Exploration of the Hamas suicide attacks. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia), 6(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2012.12023205

Cronin, A. K. (2015). ISIS is not a terrorist group: Why counterterrorism won’t stop the latest jihadist threat. Foreign Affairs, 94(2), 87–98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24483485

Damnjanović, I. (2018). Politika i tehnologija: Teorijski pristupi. Udruženje nauka i društvo.

Damnjanović, I. (2025). AI vs. democracy: Present and possible futures. Srpska politička misao (Serbian Political Thought), 96(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5937/spm94-61498

Feldman, M. (2013). Comparative lone wolf terrorism: Toward a heuristic definition. Democracy and Security, 9(3), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2013.792252

Ganor, B. (2012). The hybrid terrorist organization and incitement. In The changing forms of incitement to terror and violence: The need for a new international response (pp. 13–19). Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.

Garfinkel, S. (2003). Leaderless resistance today. First Monday, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i3.1040

Gupta, D. K., & Mundra, K. (2005). Suicide bombing as a strategic weapon: An empirical investigation of Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17(4), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550500189895

Haghani, M., Kuligowski, E., Rajabifard, A., & Lentini, P. (2022). Fifty years of scholarly research on terrorism: Intellectual progression, structural composition, trends and knowledge gaps of the field. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 68, 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102714

Hinckson, S. D. (2017). What’s in a name: Defining terrorists and terrorist organizations. Howard Law Journal, 61, 397–430.

Kaplan, J. (1997). Leaderless resistance. Terrorism and Political Violence, 9(3), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546559708427417

Laqueur, W. (2002). A history of terrorism. Transaction Publishers.

Lecocq, S. (2020). Hamas and Hezbollah: Hybrid actors between resistance and governance. International Affairs, 96(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa104

Loertscher, S., Milton, D., Price, B., & Loertscher, C. (2020). The terrorist lists: An examination of the U.S. government’s counterterrorism designation efforts. Combating Terrorism Center.

Maan, A. (2015, December 29). ISIS is not a terrorist organization. Small Wars Journal. https://archive.smallwarsjournal.com/index.php/jrnl/art/isis-is-not-a-terrorist-organization

McCormick, G. H. (2003). Terrorist decision making. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 473–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085601

Medina, R., & Hepner, G. (2008). Geospatial analysis of dynamic terrorist networks. In Values and violence: Intangible aspects of terrorism (pp. 151–167). Springer.

Michael, G. (2012). Leaderless resistance: The new face of terrorism. Defence Studies, 12(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2012.699724

Phillips, B. J. (2015). What is a terrorist group? Conceptual issues and empirical implications. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2013.800048

Rapoport, D. C. (2019). The four waves of modern terrorism. In Transnational terrorism. (pp. 3-30). Routledge.

Robinson, G. E. (2004). Hamas as social movement. In Islamic activism: A social movement theory approach (pp. 112–139).

Sageman, M. (2008). Leaderless jihad: Terror networks in the twenty-first century. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt3fhbht

Saul, B. (2019). Defining terrorism: A conceptual minefield. In E. Chenoweth, R. English, A. Gofas, & S. N. Kalyvas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of terrorism (pp. 34-49). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732914.013.2

Silke, A. (2001). The devil you know: Continuing problems with research on terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550109609697

Simeunović, D. (2009). Terorizam—Opšti deo. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Singh, R. (2013). Hamas and suicide terrorism: Multi-causal and multi-level approaches. Routledge.

Spaaij, R. (2010). The enigma of lone wolf terrorism: An assessment. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(9), 854–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.501426

Stern, J., & Berger, J. M. (2016). ISIS: The state of terror. Ecco.

Sweeney, M. M. (2019). Leaderless resistance and the truly leaderless: A case study test of the literature-based findings. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 42(7), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1407480

Thackrah, J. R. (2004). Dictionary of terrorism. Routledge.

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.

Weimann, G. (2015). Terrorism in cyberspace: The next generation. Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

Young, J. K., & Dugan, L. (2014). Survival of the fittest: Why terrorist groups endure. Perspectives on Terrorism, 8(2), 2-23.

Zanini, M., & Edwards, S. J. (2001). The networking of terror in the information age. In Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 29–60).

Downloads

Published

2026-03-26

Issue

Section

Etiology, Phenomenology and Trends of Contemporary Crime