EU-NATO COOPERATION TO COUNTER HYBRID THREARS

Authors

  • Snezana Nikodinovska-Stefanovska proffessor at Faculty of security
  • Marjan Gjurovski

Keywords:

security, hybrid warfare, hybrid threats, European Union, NATO.

Abstract

The current and foreseeable security landscape looks increasingly ‘hybrid’ in nature. Hybrid operations and tactics combine military and non-military as well as covert and overt means, including cyber-attacks, disinformation campaigns, use of irregular groups and regular armed forces, espionage, sabotage, economic pressure and personal coercion. The strategic aim of such activities is to blur the lines between peacetime, crisis and conflict – to sow doubt and to foment divisions.

The speed, scale and intensity of hybrid threats have increased in recent years. Responsibility for building resilience against, and responding to, hybrid attacks lies primarily with individual states. However, it is impossible to deal with the range of such threats alone. Given the multitude of domains and individuals potentially affected, as well as the cross border nature of many hybrid activities, more cooperation is required at all levels. Being prepared to prevent, counter and respond to hybrid attacks, whether by state or non-state actors, is a top priority for NATO as well as for the EU. Since 2016, both organizations have identified countering hybrid threats as a priority for cooperation. NATO and the EU could create an effective institutional tandem that has a wide range of diplomatic, information, military and economical instruments at its disposal. The new European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats plays a unique role in facilitating this cooperation.

The article deals with the evolution of the hybrid threats and warfare concepts, as well as, examines recent development of EU –NATO cooperation in countering hybrid threats.

Keywords: security, hybrid warfare, hybrid threats, European Union, NATO.

 

References

1. Breedlove M,. Philip :http://www.dedefensa.org/article-le_g_n_ral_bredlove_et_the_hybrid_war_24_03_2015.html
2. Gerasimov Valery, “The Value of Science in Anticipating” [in Russian], Military-Industrial Courier, February 27, 2013, http://www.vpk-news.ru/articles/14632.
3. Hoffman Frank, “On Not-So-New Warfare: Political Warfare vs. Hybrid Threats,” War on the Rocks (blog), July 28, 2014, http://warontherocks.com/2014/07/on-not-so-new-warfare-political-warfare-vs-hybridthreats/.
4. Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council JOIN(2016) 18 of 6.4.2016, Joint Framework on countering hybrid threats – a European Union response.
5. JOINT STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EU operational protocol for countering hybrid threats 'EU Playbook' (SWD(2016) 227 final)
6. Kofman Michael and M. Rojansky A Closer look at Russia’s “Hybrid War” https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/190090/5-KENNAN%20CABLE-ROJANSKY%20KOFMAN.pdf
7. Merriam Webster Online Dictionary, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hybrid
8. Murray, W. & Mansoor, P. (2012) Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present, New York: Cambridge University Press
9. NATO 2020: assured security; dynamic engagement, https://www.nato.int/strategic-concept/expertsreport.pdf, p.15
10. Popescu Nicu, “Hybrid Tactics: neither new nor only Russian”, https://www.iss.europa.eu/.../hybrid-tactics-neither-new-nor-only-russian
11. Statement by NATO Defence Ministers https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_121133.htm?selectedLocale=en
12. Stoltenberg Jens, “Zero-sum? Russia, Power Politics, and the Post-Cold War Era, Brussels Forum, March 20, 2015.
13. Wales Summit Declaration, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm

Downloads

Published

2020-07-14