THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF THE PROHIBITION OF INCITEMENT AND INSTIGATION OF INEQUITY, HATRED AND INTOLERANCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

  • Vladimir Branislav Đurić Senior Research Associate at The Institute of Comparative Law in Belgrade
Keywords: inequity, hatred, intolerance, criminal prosecution

Abstract

This paper explores the legal framework for criminal prosecution of the prohibition of incitement to and instigation of inequity, hatred and intolerance in the Republic of Serbia. The author provides an overview and analysis of the legal framework and point to the dilemmas and controversies that the criminal prosecution may face with in relation to that prohibition. The conclusion is that the provisions regulating that prohibition don’t have systemic quality and that the criminal prosecution of that prohibition consequently can have limited effects.

References

Coliver, S. (1992). Hate Speech Laws: Do They Work? In: S. Coliver (Еd.), Striking a Balance: Hate Speech, Freedom of Expression and Non-Discrmminaion, Essex, United Kingdom, University of Essex
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, (1993). General Recommendation XV, Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, 2, UN Doc A/48/18

Ćirić, J. (2008). Sloboda govora i govor mržnje – krivičnopravna regulativa, In: Zbornik „Usaglašavaje krivičnog zakonodavstva sa Ustavom Srbije“, Beograd: Udruženje za krivično pravo Srbije
Đurić, V. (2013). Kontrola ustavnosti nečinjenja (propuštanja) zakonodavca, Pravni život IV/12, 609-624.
Human Rights Committee. (1983). General comment No. 11: Article 20, Downloaded June 6, 2020
http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/CCPRGeneralCommentNo11.pdf
Jovičić, J. (2006). Krivična odgovornost i kažnjivost podstrekača u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu, In: S.Tabaroši (Ed.) Razvoj pravnog sistema Srbije i harmonizacija sa pravom EU- prilozi projektu, Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
Lazarević, LJ. (2006). Кomentar Krivičnog zakonika Republike Srbije, Beograd : Savremena administracija.
Mendel, T. (2010). Hate Speech Rules under International Law, 1-10, Downloaded June 6, 2020
http://www.law-democracy.org/
Pajvančić, M. (2009). Komentar Ustava Republike Srbije, Beograd: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Rosenfeld, M. (2003). Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis. Cardozo Law Review, 24, 1523-1567

Stojanović, Z. (2006). Кrivično pravo – opšti deo, Beograd: Pravna knjiga.
Stojanović, Z. (2020). Кomentar Кrivičnog zakonika, Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2008). Study compiling existing legislations and jurisprudence concerning defamation of and contempt for religions, UN Doc. A/HRC/9/25
Ustavni sud Srbije, Problem zakonodavnih pravnih praznina (propusta) u ustavnosudskoj praksi, Upitnik za 14. Коngres Коnferencije evropskih ustavnih sudova (Questionnaire on the topic "Problems of Legislative Omission in Constitutional Jurisprudence" for the XIVth Congress of the Conference of European Constitutional Courts, May 22-29 2011), 1-29, Downloaded June 6, 2020
http://www.confeuconstco.org/reports/rep-xiv/report_Serbian_se.pdf
Published
2020-11-27
Section
Criminalistic and Criminal Justice Aspects in Solving and Proving of Criminal Of