THE IMPORTANCE OF SPEECH PAUSES FOR PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC AND FORENSIC OBSERVATIONS

  • Svetlana Zdravković
  • Slobodan Jovičić /
Keywords: pauses in speech, filled pauses, psychotherapy, forensic markers

Abstract

During the psychotherapeutic process, the pauses could “tell” a lot about a patient`s personality, problems and experiences. The length and the quality of pauses could be connected with intrapsychic conflicts which a patient tries to “hide" and with the transference too. Looked at from the perspective of the work on dreams and history, pauses could be very useful for the psychotherapist’s understanding of the patient. Theoretical concepts are interwoven with the examples from clinical practice. In forensic view, pauses in speech are analyzed on a phonetic-linguistic basis. The paper presents the classification of pauses with special reference to filled pauses. In these pauses the silence can be filled with a neutral voice /әː/ or a voice combination /әːm/. Several examples will indicate their intra-speaker stability as well as inter-speaker variability. Experiments have shown that a certain set of acoustic-phonetic features makes these pauses important forensic markers.

References

Clark, H. H., Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speech. Cognition, 84, 73-111.
Crystal, D. (2008). Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Blackwell.
Foulkes, P., Carrol, G., Hughes, S. (2004). Sociolinguistics and acoustic variability in filled pauses. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics. Helsinki, Finland.
Grosjean, F., Deschamps, A. (1973). Analyse des variables temporelles du français spontané. Phonetica, 28(3-4), 191-226.
Hughes, V., Wood, S., Foulkes, P. (2016). Strength of forensic voice comparison evidence from the acoustics of filled pauses. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 99-132.
Jessen, M. (2008). Forensic phonetics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2: 671-711.
Jovičić, S. T. (1999). Govorna komunikacija: fiziologija, psihoakustika i percepcija (Speech communication: physiology, psychoacoustic and perception). Nauka, Beograd.
Jovičić, S. T., Zdravković, S. (2019). Effect of stress on verbal expression: physiology, psychology and practical implications. The International Conference "Languages and cultures in time and space 8", Novi Sad.
Jung, C. G. (1977). Psychological types. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and Henley, 661-665.
Jung, C. G. (1981). The Structure and Dynamic of the Psyche. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and Helney,194-219.
Jung, C. G. (2009a). The Red Book. Liber Novus, W. W. Norton & Company, New York and London, 230.
Jung, C. G. (2009b). The Red Book. Liber Novus, W. W. Norton & Company, New York and London, 267.
Kendall, T. (2009). Speech Rate, Pause, and Linguistic Variation: An Examination Through the Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project. PhD thesis, Duke University.
Kircher, T. T., Brammer, M. J., Levelt, W., Bartels, M., and McGuire, P. K. (2004). Pausing for thought: engagement of left temporal cortex during pauses in speech. NeuroImage, 21(1), 84– 90.
Künzel, H. J. (1997). Some general phonetic and forensic aspects of speaking tempo. Forensic Linguistics, 4(1), 48-83.
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(1), 1-38.
Main, R. (2007). Revelations of Chance. State University of New York Press, Albany.
Marshak, M. D. (1998). Patient and Analyst: Transference and Countertransference in Contemporary Jungian Analysis, Routledge, London and New York, 55-85.
Megyesi, B., Gustafson-Capková, S. (2002). Production and perception of pauses and their linguistic context in read and spontaneous speech in Swedish. 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP2002 - INTERSPEECH 2002, Denver, Colorado, USA, September 16-20, 2002
Mindell, A. (1990). Working on Yourself Alone. Penguin Books Ltd, London, 23-38.
New Oxford American Dictionary, Third edition.
Papadopoulos, R. (2006). The Handbook of Jungian Psychology. Routledge, London and New York, 94-175.
Rapcan, V., D’Arcy, S., Yeap, S., Afzal, N., Thakore, J., Reilly, R. B. (2010). Acoustic and temporal analysis of speech: a potential biomarker for schizophrenia. Medical Engineering & Physics, 32, 1074–1079.
Rajković, M., Jovičić, S. T., Grozdić, Đ. T., Zdravković, S., Subotić, M. (2018). A note on acoustic features in pitch contours for discrimination of happiness and anger. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2018, 104, 369–372.
Rose, P. (2002). Forensic speaker identification. Taylor and Francis, London and New York.
Shriberg, E. (2001). To ‘errrr’ is human: ecology and acoustics of speech disfluencies. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31, 153-169.
Sleebos, Y. M. A. (2018). Filled pauses in first and second language users: how speaker-specific is u(h)m across languages? MA Thesis, Leiden University.
Swerts, M., Wichmann, A., Beun, R-J. (1996). Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (volume 2), 1033-1036.
Tottie, G. (2011). Uh and Um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16: 173-197.
Tschäpe, N., Trouvain, J., Bauer, D., Jessen, M. (2005). Idiosyncratic patterns of filled pauses. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics. Marrakesh, Morocco.
Zdravković, S., Jovičić, S. T. (2018). Stress and emotions in voice and speech: A forensic view. International scientific conference “Archibald Reiss days”, Thematic conference proceedings of international significance, Belgrade, 1, 477-489.
Zdravković, S., Jovičić, S. T., Gudurić, S. (2019). The voice and speech quality correlates of psychological observations in jungian active imagination experiment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(4), 859-876.
Published
2020-11-27
Section
Innovative Techniques and Equipment in Forensic Engineering