CBRN THREATS AND SECURITY: THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES, POLICE AND SECURITY FORCES
Keywords:
Police, Security Forces, Fundemental Sciences, CBRN threats, CBRN terrorismAbstract
This mini review provides an in-depth analysis of the role and importance of fundamental sciences, police, and security forces in addressing CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiation, and Nuclear) threats and underscores the perennial nature of CBRN dangers and the necessity for continuous vigilance and proactive measures to ensure societal safety and security. Also the review stresses the evolving landscape of CBRN threats, with adversaries, terrorists, and criminal groups seeking to exploit these agents for malicious purposes. It highlights the shift from traditional defense strategies to those leveraging artificial intelligence and technological advancements in weaponry and discusses the diverse implications of CBRN threats, ranging from household chemicals to chemical factories and nuclear power plants, and their potential as warfare agents in terrorist attacks. It emphasizes the importance of research and collaboration among relevant ministries and organizations to assess and mitigate these risks. In conclusion, the review calls for interagency cooperation and coordination at local, national, and international levels to effectively manage CBRN threats. It highlights the critical role of basic sciences in identifying and mitigating CBRN threats and the need for preparedness and public awareness to prevent or minimize damages from such threats.
References
• AFAD. (2024). https://www.afad.gov.tr/kbrn/kimyasal-tehditler41 (E.T. 23.03.2024).
• Akbulut, N. (2019). Okul laboratuvarlarındaki biyolojik risklerin değerlendirilmesi ve farkındalık düzeylerinin tespiti. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi.
• Amend, N., Niessen K.V., Seeger, T., Wille, T., Worek, F., Thiermann, H. (2020). Diagnostics and treatment of nerve agent poisoning-current status and future developments. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1479, 13-28.
• Amini, H., Solaymani-Dodaran, M., Mousavi, B., Beladi, S. N. A., Soroush, M. R., Abolghasemi, J., ... & Ghanei, M. (2020). Long-term health outcomes among survivors exposed to sulfur mustard in Iran. JAMA network open, 3(12), e2028894-e2028894.
• Artenstein, A.W. (2016). Biological Attack. Ciottone's Disaster Medicine, 480–488.
• Artika, I. M., Wiyatno, A., & Ma'roef, C. N. (2020). Pathogenic viruses: Molecular detection and characterization. Infection, genetics and evolution. Journal Of Molecular Epidemiology and Evolutionary Genetics in Infectious Diseases, 81, 104-215.
• Atlas, R. M. (2001). Bioterrorism before and after September 11. Critical reviews in microbiology, 27(4), 355-379.
• Bhaskar, A. S. B., and Sant, B. (2020). Toxins as biological warfare agents. In Handbook on Biological Warfare Preparedness. Academic Press.
• Christopher, G. W., Cieslak, T. J., Pavlin, J. A., Eitzen, E. M. (1997). Biological Warfare, A Historical Perspective. JAMA, 278 (5), 412-417.
• Chugh, T. (2019). Bioterrorism: Clinical and public health aspects of anthrax. Current Medicine Research and Practice, 9(3), 110-111.
• Clarke, S. C. (2002). Bioterrorism: an overview. Br J Biomed Sci, 59(4), 232-234.
• Dando, M.R. (2000). The new biological weapons: threat, proliferation and control. Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.
• Gülegen R., (2018). Erişkin kadınların evsel kimyasalları seçme saklama ve kullanma davranışları. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi
• Hamele, M., Poss, W. B., Sweney, J., (2014). Disaster preparedness, pediatric considerations in primary blast injury, chemical, and biological terrorism. World Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 3(1), 15.
• Janik, E., Ceremuga, M., Saluk-Bijak, J., & Bijak, M. (2019). Biological toxins as the potential tools for bioterrorism. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(5), 1181.
• Karacan, E., (2018). İş kazaları ve meslek hastalıklarının önlenmesinde ergonomik koşulların etkisi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(56), 792-798.
• Kearney, A., and Pettit, C. (2016). Introduction to Biological Agents and Pandemics. Ciottone's Disaster Medicine, 696–698.
• Kimyasal, Biyolojik, Radyolojik, Nükleer Tehdit ve Tehlikelere Dair Görev Yönetmeliği (1,10,2020). Resmi gazete (Sayı: 31261) Erişim adresi: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/21.5.3033.pdf
• Lee, M., & You, M. (2020). Psychological and behavioral responses in South Korea during the early stages of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(9), 2977.
• Lugar, R. (2005). The Lugar survey on proliferation threats and responses, United States Senator Richard G. Lugar, 13-17.
• Noah, D.L., Huebner, K.D., Darling, R.G., Waeckerle, J.F. (2002). The history and threat of biological warfare and terrorism. Emerg Med Clin, 55-71.
• Uzunoğulları, N., Gümüş, M. (2017). Virüs taksonomisinin tarihsel gelişimi ve son durumu. Bahçe, 46(2), 51-57.
• Von Lubitz, D. K. (2003). Bioterrorism: field guide to disease identification and initial patient management. CRC Press.
• White S. M. (2002). Chemicaland Biological Weapons: Implicationsfor Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 89(2), 306-324.
• Yılmaz, S., (2015). Kitle imha silahları ve silahsızlanma: Orta Doğu örneği. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi.
